Prime Minister was on television this evening telling the party faithful (1) progress has been made on taking the country back [日本を取り戻す] and (2) a lot of the criticism of his “the constitution means whatever I want it to mean” policies is criticism for the sake of criticism [批判の為の批判].
Taking the country back? From whom? The facile answer is “taking the reins of government back from the opposition parties.” But that’s not the real answer. Because this is all tied up with his historical revisionism and desire to shatter what he calls “the postwar regime,” it has to be about the old-guard demolishing postwar-regime thinking, which postwar thinking includes, for example, Article 9 of the Constitution. He is after a basic change in Japan’s political philosophy — a reversion to the prewar regime with its top-down, お国のため thinking, and its many anti-democratic elements. In short, he wants to take the country back from the people.
According to some researches, about 1 out of 3 men say they experience this problem in their sexual life. cialis online generic Here are some that tend to cause problems, vegetable juices, peppers, chilies, onion, garlic, and tomato products. purchase of viagra These browse for more info discount viagra compartments are a collection of veins, which become inflamed with system during full sex-related confidence. Prostate gland helps in control and release of ordine cialis on line urine and so on. Then there is this “criticism for the sake of criticism” meme — which is essentially a way of dismissing the criticism without having to address its substance. It is saying this is not serious criticism — primarily because it does not start from the same premises — and so can be ignored. Not only ignored, but publicly branded as “to be ignored.”
Both of these are the hallmarks of a man hellbent on making his mark on history — and both bode ill for Japan’s, and the world’s, future if he succeeds.