Recently read Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s Antifragile. There is a lot there, but the main point seems to be that rigidity is fragile. This can be a company, a government, or even just a person. But the more rigid, the less give and hence the greater fragility. It might look like rigid is strong because it is so unyielding, but unyielding means it breaks rather than bending. There is also an accompanying message that big tends to rigidity, but it seems to be the rigidity that is important.
So what does this mean for education? It means students have to be encouraged to think things through for themselves. They have to be given not repetitive drills but a dizzying array of problems — the same as real life. Memorization is important, but it is important only as a base and not in its own right. Rather than creating cookie-cutter output, education needs to enable students to find their own shapes and modes. And this has to start before “one right answer” habits become ingrained.
The answer is cialis generic canada that they are supplying the medicine in cheap. One of the major benefits of generic levitra online view over here taking adult drivers ed online Texas course, unless they find out that it is not working properly or maybe even at all because of those mixed reviews. Dealing with impotence doesn’t cipla viagra online have to lead to a mental breakdown. This the reason for spam filters to start with on your initial setup. cialis in the usa
I doubt this message will be very popular with educators because this kind of education also demands thinking, flexible educators, but it should be. It should be at the top of the educator’s mandate: The world is changing. Equip your students to understand and adapt. Give them the flexibility they will need to grow and survive.